|
国际上项目管理认证体系有IPMP，PMP，PRINCE2等等，各种认证体系的认证条件、覆盖面及难度互不相同，各种认证的效果如何。由美国高级项目管理促进会主席Stacy
Goff经过调查研究所所撰写的这篇文章给予了全面的分析，可以看出PRINCE2各级认证在所有认证中有效性最低，PMP各级认证居中，IPMP各级认证有效性最高。
COMPARING PM CERTIFICATIONS
Which project and programme management certifications are best for you?
Learn how the Certification Effectiveness Cube helps you make better-informed
decisions. This analysis is based on a range of three independent studies and
reports. We offer a fresh new analysis to help balance misinformed impressions
seen elsewhere on the web.
项目管理(PM)资质认证体系间之优劣比较
到底哪一种项目管理资质认证的证书对您来讲最为合适?充分了解认证有效性立方体模型能够帮助您做出更明智的决策。该分析基于三个独立的研究和报告。我们提供了一种全新的分析方法来纠正并且平衡网络上那些通过其他渠道上得来的错误印象。下面是这篇文章的一些重点和亮点。
The Certification Effectiveness Cube is a representation of three factors
that are important in evaluating any certification: A. Prerequisites B. Breadth
of Coverage C. Rigor of Assessment The article explores those three factors, or
criteria, and acknowledges that popularity is also an important consideration;
it reveals an interesting relationship between popularity and effectiveness.
认证有效性立方体模型是评估任何认证过程的至关重要的三个因素:A.必备条件和资质;B.覆盖面和广度;C.
评估过程的严谨性。这篇文章探讨了上述这三个因素和相应的标准，并说明了认证的被认可程度也是一个重要的考虑因素;它揭示了受欢迎程度和效率之间有趣的关系。
A. Prerequisites are important. They help assure that a certification is
targeted at the right qualified persons. See below a comparison of a sel ection
of PM-related certification program prerequisites, based on a study by Dr. Paul
Giammalvo.
A. 必备条件和资质 对认证体系来讲至关重要。 它们有助于确保认证过程针对的受众都是合适的、有资格的项目管理专业人士。请看下图，这是根据Paul
Giammalvo博士的研究所得出的一个有关项目管理相关认证必备条件和资质选择过程的比较。
B. The second factor considered in the article is the Breadth of Coverage.
See the diagram below, comparing the coverage of a variety of project management
standards, based on a GAPPS study. As other organizations have come to
understand that the “triple constraint” has been long-dead, and that business
savvy and leadership & interpersonal skills have some of the greatest impact
on project success, just look at the chart. When someone asks you “Are you
ready?” The chart shows Who Is Ready Now!
B. 其次，本文考虑的是覆盖面和广度。
请参考下面这张图，基于GAPPS研究的基础上，针对各种项目管理标准的覆盖范围进行了对比。其他的组织机构逐渐认识到“三重约束”已经不复存在，商业头脑、领导能力和人际关系技能对项目成功的影响最大，只要看一下图表就能够了解。当有人问你：“你准备好了吗?”，图表显示的则是“谁已经准备好了!”
C. And the Rigor of Assessment is the third factor, or criterion,
considered in the article. This factor is also based on a GAPPS study, and
includes degree programs and other comparisons. Why is this Rigor important?
Because knowledge alone, while an important foundation, is merely a starting
point. And if it is only acquired for the purposes of passing a multiple-choice
exam, it soon decays–the half-life of knowledge acquired, but not-applied is
said to be two weeks. That knowledge must be applied (moving towards Skill),
added to the interpersonal skills needed to engage others in its application
(Behavioral competences), and adapted in multiple settings (practical
experience) to get needed business results. Certifications with higher Rigor
scores assess more of the full life-cycle of that knowledge, from short-term
acquisition to business results.
C. 评估的严谨性是文章中考虑的第三个因素。 这个因素也是基于GAPPS的研究，包括程度上和其他方面的比较。为何严谨性如此之重要?
因为就知识本身而言，虽然它是一个重要的基础，却仅仅只能算是一个起点。
如果知识的获取只是为了通过一个满篇都是多项选择的考试，那么知识的半衰期很快就会到来，会迅速地被人遗忘，如果是在不能学以致用的情况下据说是两周。这些知识必须应用于人际交往技能(行为能力)，并在多种场景(实践经验)中加以应用，以获得所需的商业成果。拥有更高标准、更严格打分的证书体系可以评估知识从短期获取到商业结果的完整生命周期。
WHICH CERTIFICATIONS WIN?
There are several ways of answering this question, depending on your
requirements. What is most interesting about analyzing the outcomes of these
three independent studies is what happens when we cross-multiply the three
studies’ results. Chart 4 below shows the results of cross-multiplying the
volume of the Certification Effectiveness Cube. But your requirements may show a
different result. We leave the decision up to you. Regardless of your outcome,
you are the winner when PPM certification candidates—and their managers and
ex ecutives—can see the relative strengths of today’s leading PPM certifications.
And, when you win, the practice of effective project and programme management
wins.
哪种认证体系更胜一筹?
回答这个问题可以有多种方法，这完全取决于你的需求。
对这三项独立研究结果的分析最有趣的一点是：当我们把三项研究结果交叉到一起时会发生什么。下面的图4显示出证书有效性立方体模型交叉到一起以后的结果。
但你的需求可能又会体现出一种不同的结果。我们把决定权交给你。不管结果如何，当PPM认证的申请者、他们的经理和主管们都能够了解到当今领先的PPM认证的相对优势，你就是赢家。
而且，当你赢了的时候，有效的项目和项目群管理的实践就能够赢得胜利。
After all, that is the basis of our Certification Effectiveness Cube: We
are looking for not a single point of evaluation (a typical situation on other
websites), or even two points of evaluation: We are looking for all three
points, to assess the volume of certification effectiveness. See the full
article, Comparing PM Certifications, for the “The Cube’s” descriptions of the
PM certification effectiveness factors of popular global offerings. The article
also has more details and links for each of the studies, so you can draw your
own conclusions.
不管怎样，这是我们认证有效性立方体模型的基础:我们正在寻找和论证的不是一个评估过程中的某一个单一点(而这时某些其他网站的典型情况)，或者两点：我们正在寻找的是全部的三个点，从而评估认证的有效性。
新闻来源:新闻-认证
发布时间:2017/11/24
项目管理者联盟[mypm.net]
|
